Ask me Stuff!

What you see...

an attempt to see the world as it really is, broken up with random bouts of writing, hilarity, music, youtube, or stuff that i just like :D
Ask me Stuff!

people and their lives

so it’s really warm and really late and I’m really sleepy, but I’m still going to try to be coherent.
i was reading The Fault in Our Stars, by John Green, and there was this line that made me think, “i thought about how wonderfully strange it would be to live in a place where almost everything had been built by the dead.”
i mean, the whole book was thought provoking and profound in ways i could only ever dream of being, but that line especially made me think. it really made me think because a few months ago, my grandmother visited, and my whole family went to this little teensey Amish town. my family was totally cool with it, but i almost didn’t want to get out of the car. i couldn’t stop thinking about what it must be like to live a lifestyle that has become your livelihood. i couldn’t stop feeling like we were not only intruders, but like we were the annoying brats at the zoo who always want to go in the cages with the animals. that’s what it felt like to me, like we were at the zoo, but the animals were just like us, and the cages were invisible rules that only affected them. i couldn’t stand it. i was so uncomfortable the entire time. and the more i couldn’t help but think that way, the more i couldn’t help but think of my childhood.
as a child, i lived in countries where i was the minority all the time, and many of the places we visited, i was the minority. age, race, money…. all these things set me apart from the people around me, but i never really noticed. i mean, i guess i noticed, but i think i just pushed it aside, because i didn’t feel like it needed to be dealt with. but thinking about it, i had done this before, gone to a place where someones lifestyle had become their livelihood, simply because it was what they could or had to do to survive. and just like in the Amish town, i was uncomfortable in the tiny Thai villages in the mountains, or out in the Saudi desert with the nomads. it’s not that i was uncomfortable with the people, no, i loved the people. but the situation, that feeling of looking at an animal in the zoo, even though the animal was human. that’s what i was uncomfortable with.
yes, it does create a very poignant moment of realization that, as humans, we both fascinate and disgust ourselves. we want to look at other ways of life, supposedly to learn (i know i always learn something), but i think, also to distance ourselves from how we live. we are disgusted with what humanity has become, so we go, we seek out those lifestyles that are “primitive” to us, so that we can feel sophisticated and worth something.
but which lifestyle is the truly primitive one?  the one where no one lives beyond their means, and most people are happy and life is pretty much always good? or the one where we must beat down others to feel good about ourselves, where we rely on so many things to reach out to others that we must distance ourselves to communicate?
i ask only that you take from this not pessimism, but the sense of need, not greed, or lust, but of change. please help to make our world a bit more awesome, or at least a bit less sucky. why do we live in a world where we put others like us under a microscope for our own amusement? why not live in a world where we put ourselves under a microscope to become better people?
because we are afraid
people don’t like silence because then they can hear themselves. they use the music they blast to hide from that silence, to drown out the silence, because they are afraid of what they might hear from themselves.
don’t be afraid, it’s honestly not that bad.

since 2010 (after AVPS)

  • Darren Criss: Got a part for Glee, Imogene and had his debut on Broadway.
  • Joey Richter: Dubbed a cartoon, got a part for Disney Channel's Jessie.
  • Lauren Lopez: Got a part for the film "Struck by Lightning" and will be on Broadway with Twilight the Musical.
  • Tyler Brunsman: Was one of the male leads in the Radio City Christmas Spectacular
  • Matt Lang, Nick Lang, Joe Walker and Brian Holden: Won the 2011 Broadway World Chicago Award for Best New Work for the musical Starship.
  • AJ Holmes: playing Frederick Frankenstein in the Young Frankenstein Musical National Tour.
  • Team Starkid: Made the musical Starship, went to LeakyCon and on their first tour.
  • JOE MOSES: HAS HAD A SERIES OF SUCCESSFUL COMEDY SHOWS IN NYC.
  • Dylan Saunders: Played Lampwick in the Chicago Shakespeare Theater production of Pinocchio.
  • Julia Albain: Wrote her book "A Glamorously Unglamorous Life"
  • Reblog if you're proud of our kids.
eddplant:

bradofarrell:

mangobug:

hurray for variation 

Not … really?
What…
What show are you even talking about.
The only thing I could think of that even has this kind of cast is Scooby Doo which famously had a hot girl and a frumpster. And everyone LOVES Velma. Like when I think of every cartoon with humanoid female characters, the “hot girl” is usually there for plotty reasons and the “average girl” is almost always the fan favorite.

Also see:

Or do you mean like, the animated shows on Fox?

Nope? Like maybe MARGE but every other woman is not sexy at all and Marge is pretty matronly.

Lois? Maybe…? Also Lois is pretty ‘full figured’ and has a oddly shaped face? There’s more variation between the women on Family Guy then the men? Bonnie is pregnant, Loretta is husky, Meg is dumpy, Brian’s girlfriend is fit. Most of the men on Family Guy are fat guys.


Of the two women on both of these shows - no one could accuse Haley of being overly sexual, and Fran, like Marge, just looks like a mom. Cleveland’s wife is pretty ‘full figured’ and his daughter is sexy but it’s part of her character. Because it’s a sitcom, and a lot of the plots are about him being over protective of his sexually active teen daughter. She’s like the only “sexy” character on the show that I can think of.

On King of the Hill - almost none of the women are “sexy” in the stereotypical way implied by this graphic. Except for Luanne, but Luanne’s sexiness is a challenge she often has to overcome. Like. Luanne is probably the most complex character on King of the Hill, she has the greatest story arc of anyone on the show and her being “sexy” is such a minor aspect of her character. Like, Joseph is also supposed to be “sexy” after puberty, and it’s also similarly just a minor aspect of his character. Maybe Nancy? But even she’s supposed to be like a burnt out prom queen who is learning to slow down. God like everyone on this show has so much variation.
Or do you mean like, REAL cartoons, like for kids?

No.

Nope.

Maybe Frankie, MAYBE, except she’s just supposed to look like the show’s head writer, Lauren Faust.

NOPE.
Haha, are you talking about the ponies?

Or maybe Adventure Time?
Hahaha.
ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ADVENTURE TIME.

That is a LOT of variation in female characters.

Like.

Come on.

Seriously.
SERIOUSLY.
I am all for - accurate representation of women in media but - seriously, cartoons!? Women are probably have more diverse representations in cartoons than in any other medium. Probably because, A) there’s no extra draw to adding “sexy” characters because most people aren’t attracted to cartoons, B) curvy and lumpy and oddly shaped characters look better on animation and you can pull that off more easily and subtly with female characters than you can with male characters, who pretty much have to either be discrertly fit, thin, or fat. C) Cartoons are often targeted towards kids so there’s less of a sex appeal angle in the first place.
Like seriously this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen anyone complain about.
It is literally not even a non-issue, like, the opposite of this alleged issue is true. You are literally make up a thing to complain about that is the opposite of reality.
It’s just absurd.

And he never regretted the decision to follow brad

while bradoferrel’s argument is true for many, if not most, western cartoons he’s forgetting that the original picture specifies simply animation, not just cartoons. there are movies that are animated, such as the incredables, which yes, has a female character that isn’t “stereotypical” as based on the picture, but the other main female characters are, and have you ever watched a disney movie? the main female character is always the architypal image.  you cannot say those girls dont have similar, if not the same, body types. also, he completely forgot about other animation, such as anime, oh, yep,  oh, yep, her too,  oh, and them too.
 and many video games, because they’re animated too! for example,  and  and  and even those with bigger boobs, like  and  and all have the same basic body type. but they’re not “cartoons” per say. 
and just as he is entitled to be annoyed or complain about the fact that someone is annoyed by the fact that many female characters in animation (not just cartoons, mind you) are portrayed in a manner that, while a supposed representation of the paragon of what a woman should look like, is often so similar to other female characters in animation as to look the same from animated work to animated work.

eddplant:

bradofarrell:

mangobug:

hurray for variation 

Not … really?

What…

What show are you even talking about.

The only thing I could think of that even has this kind of cast is Scooby Doo which famously had a hot girl and a frumpster. And everyone LOVES Velma. Like when I think of every cartoon with humanoid female characters, the “hot girl” is usually there for plotty reasons and the “average girl” is almost always the fan favorite.

Also see:

Or do you mean like, the animated shows on Fox?

Nope? Like maybe MARGE but every other woman is not sexy at all and Marge is pretty matronly.

Lois? Maybe…? Also Lois is pretty ‘full figured’ and has a oddly shaped face? There’s more variation between the women on Family Guy then the men? Bonnie is pregnant, Loretta is husky, Meg is dumpy, Brian’s girlfriend is fit. Most of the men on Family Guy are fat guys.

Of the two women on both of these shows - no one could accuse Haley of being overly sexual, and Fran, like Marge, just looks like a mom. Cleveland’s wife is pretty ‘full figured’ and his daughter is sexy but it’s part of her character. Because it’s a sitcom, and a lot of the plots are about him being over protective of his sexually active teen daughter. She’s like the only “sexy” character on the show that I can think of.

On King of the Hill - almost none of the women are “sexy” in the stereotypical way implied by this graphic. Except for Luanne, but Luanne’s sexiness is a challenge she often has to overcome. Like. Luanne is probably the most complex character on King of the Hill, she has the greatest story arc of anyone on the show and her being “sexy” is such a minor aspect of her character. Like, Joseph is also supposed to be “sexy” after puberty, and it’s also similarly just a minor aspect of his character. Maybe Nancy? But even she’s supposed to be like a burnt out prom queen who is learning to slow down. God like everyone on this show has so much variation.

Or do you mean like, REAL cartoons, like for kids?

No.

Nope.

Maybe Frankie, MAYBE, except she’s just supposed to look like the show’s head writer, Lauren Faust.

NOPE.

Haha, are you talking about the ponies?

Or maybe Adventure Time?

Hahaha.

ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ADVENTURE TIME.

That is a LOT of variation in female characters.

Like.

Come on.

Seriously.

SERIOUSLY.

I am all for - accurate representation of women in media but - seriously, cartoons!? Women are probably have more diverse representations in cartoons than in any other medium. Probably because, A) there’s no extra draw to adding “sexy” characters because most people aren’t attracted to cartoons, B) curvy and lumpy and oddly shaped characters look better on animation and you can pull that off more easily and subtly with female characters than you can with male characters, who pretty much have to either be discrertly fit, thin, or fat. C) Cartoons are often targeted towards kids so there’s less of a sex appeal angle in the first place.

Like seriously this is the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever seen anyone complain about.

It is literally not even a non-issue, like, the opposite of this alleged issue is true. You are literally make up a thing to complain about that is the opposite of reality.

It’s just absurd.

And he never regretted the decision to follow brad

while bradoferrel’s argument is true for many, if not most, western cartoons he’s forgetting that the original picture specifies simply animation, not just cartoons. there are movies that are animated, such as the incredables, which yes, has a female character that isn’t “stereotypical” as based on the picture, but the other main female characters are, and have you ever watched a disney movie? the main female character is always the architypal image.  you cannot say those girls dont have similar, if not the same, body types. also, he completely forgot about other animation, such as anime, oh, yep,  oh, yep, her too,  oh, and them too.

 and many video games, because they’re animated too! for example,  and  and  and even those with bigger boobs, like  and  and all have the same basic body type. but they’re not “cartoons” per say. 

and just as he is entitled to be annoyed or complain about the fact that someone is annoyed by the fact that many female characters in animation (not just cartoons, mind you) are portrayed in a manner that, while a supposed representation of the paragon of what a woman should look like, is often so similar to other female characters in animation as to look the same from animated work to animated work.

(Source: halfemptymouse, via staticzeta)

thinking is terrible: re: nerdfighters

vondell-swain:

I’m a nerdfighter and I’m friends with so many nerdfighters who are genuinely some of the nicest, loveliest, funniest, cleverest, most caring, most pleasant people I’ve ever had the pleasure to know, and it just kind of really rubs me the wrong way when people just generalize…

I really should be using these instead of taking pictures of them, but they’re so pretty…oh well, back to work. 

I really should be using these instead of taking pictures of them, but they’re so pretty…
oh well, back to work. 

I’m not really a Mustang girl, I mean, my name’s not even Sally, but I do really like this belt.

I’m not really a Mustang girl, I mean, my name’s not even Sally, but I do really like this belt.

so i dont get it

i have a friend, he’s one of my favorites. i dont look at him in a romantic way or anything, but sometimes, he’s in my dreams. whenever he is, they’re messed up as all get out, one i remember him being in, he was pregnant, on a train, for thirteen months. he gave birth on that train, and this didnt faze any of the six other girls with us, or either of us. sometimes he makes out with dudes while we sit around smoking and drinking. sometimes we argue about when is the best time in both of our scheduals to kill this person, or buy that dog, or have sex (which, bythewaywhaaattt). sometimes the dreams are pure hilarity, and i end up using parts of them as stories that i just write. sometimes i’m so confused that i realise it’s a dream. sometimes it seems like something he’d do, and i’m not sure if it’s a dream or not. 
i have no explination for the fact that it’s only my one friend who messes with my subconcious, but thats how it is.  

A Study In Comfort


(sorry that the pictures are a bit dark)

A Study In Childhood